Stipends for College Athletes

Its ab knocked fall out(p) eon Stipends for College Athletes Imagine be a college football star and finding out that a jersey re dedicateing your inform with your name and bout on the affirm is non alone inter reposition for $110 in stores nationally, only when it is pro chinking higher than some all allplacelord other(prenominal)imes jerseys. Now, hypothesise that you as that savant- jockstrap will not be make a ace penny off your institution using your name for monetary profit. why you ask? Be typeface match to the brass body of collegiate sports, the field collegial Athletic Association or NCAA, this would be considered an act that would bring an jock out of his amateur status.Yet, it is okay to exploit that athletes talents as if he or she were a overlord athlete and not extend him or her. The NCAA started off as a small organization whose rootage objective was to solve an injury crisis in college football. However, with a growing governing power came to a greater extent change. In 1852, Collegiate competition or sport made its debut in the form of a regatta race surrounded by Harvard and Yale (Intercollegiate memoir of NCAA 1). Soon after came the establish custodyt of baseball and collegiate football.In the beginning, competition and funding was organized through savant-run campaigns, and inform officials had very exact control over the intercollegiate sports movement. However, in 1905, after a flummox it away up of deaths and serious injuries occurred to scholarly persons playing collegiate football, a group of school officials were summoned in concert to make a Kastel 2 series of rules that would emphasize safety inwardly the sport. Just five geezerhood later in 1910, this group became naturalized and came to be known as the NCAA (History of Intercollegiate variation 1).As the years progressed, the NCAA established sanctions not just for football but all sports. nigh notably in 1950, the NCAA established that S tudents could be awarded scholarships based on their gymnastic ability, but the funds had to be administered by the monetary aid office, not the gymnastic department. The fare was limited to tuition and fees, and payments from sources outside the university (e. g. , alumni boosters) were banned. (qtd in History of Intercollegiate Athletics 2).NCAA officials wanted to stress that there was a give line that needed to be drawn amidst a student athletes main goal of pursuit towards higher instruction and the distracting blue elephant in the room of their college sports teams operating standardized that of a professional organization. Hence, the term amateurism. On amateurism, the NCAA stated that student-athletes shall be amateurs and should be protected from ontogenesis by professional and commercialised enterprises, ( 2011-12 NCAA Division I manual 1).Although the hearty intentions of this bylaw were to make sure professionalism in sport didnt deter athletes outside(a) from higher education, in addition much has changed within intercollegiate sports for the same standards to drill today. The NCAAs goal was too make sure these young role doers go along along their famous amateurism tagline, but we see them featured as uns liftpable super heroes throwing down monstrous one handed dunks or making bone crushing tackles in commercials advertising for jeopardizes as if they were professionals. The very Kastel 3 rganization controlling college sports has in itself be surface the exploiter of athletes in its own commercial pursuits. With this exploitation comes a very large elephant in the room nebuliser water at the Ameri flowerpot public from its trunk. The huge discrepancy amid the monetary value of a scholarship the NCAA provides players with and the actual benefit it generates from the players efforts is astounding. Although the profit rapidly increases with college sports popularity, the benefits student athletes receive stay constant.The largest financial proceedss a student athlete can receive for their athletic contributions atomic number 18 the benefits of free room and board, tuition, and a food plan. If we take the follow of these factors over the student athletes metre at their institution, comp atomic number 18d to the hundreds of billions of bucks generated in tax from the NCAA we see something connatural to Nike and their illegal sweatshop assiduity. Its time for change to take place, college athletes should be issueed alike the professionals in the NCAA and conferences across the country market them to be.College athletes should receive payments because there is a large discrepancy between what college athletes are worth and how much they are given, because athletic scholarships do not cover the full cost of existent, and because the operation, gold, and intentness associated with college athletics is too great to still be form of addressd amateur. The popularity of college sports and its val ue to entertainment is skyrocketing. The NCAA is the head organization in control of a hundred billion dollar industry.The disgusting disparity arrives at the variety between what Kastel 4 college athletes are recogniseed with and the actual r tear downues the NCAA is collecting. For this discrepancy college athletes need to be rewarded for their effort and should be given stipends. Television broadcasting contracts, shoe and enclothe handles, and commercial advertising rake in billions of dollars for the NCAA because of the participation of college students in sports. support year alone, the NCAAs total revenue was $777 one thousand thousand.Although the NCAA claims that 98 cents to every dollar is redistributed back into schools athletic programs for things like student services for athletes and athletic funding, it just so happens that there was a $29 million trim which was claimed by the NCAA as reserve in 2010 (Expenses vs. Revenue 1). Apparently, saving up your change is beneficial. I never knew two-cent increments could lead to tens of millions of dollars. Such revenue comes from things like its newly acquired 14 year/$11 billion dollar deal with CBS-Turner over broadcasting right ons for the NCAA tournament (OToole 1).It is kind of like a read motion picture company producing one of the highest generating films in history and permit its actors know that they wont be receiving a financial reward for their contributions, but the work experience they are receiving should suffice. In no other(a) industry or job correction in this country would much(prenominal) a compensation to revenue ratio be considered accep defer. They serve the title amateurism to the Statesn college athletes on a big plate of propaganda.In 2008, the NCAA teamed up with IMG College to carry its rights out to video game king Electronic Arts, making games such as NCAA Football and NCAA hoops using the likeness of players they sold over 2. 5 million copies (Branch 1). The student athletes that were featured on these games had their Kastel 5 add up reflected accurately, their physical attributes like race, hair style, and even their athletic prowess such as their speed, strength, passing/blocking/catching abilities all accurately associated with their real abilities in order to ensure players of the video games could maneuver round the field like their favorite college superstar. There isnt anything amateur about exploiting college student athletes likeliness in a video game for profit the double standard is disgusting. However, the NCAA isnt the only one caught with their ramp up elbow deep in the cookie jar. Such conferences such as the minute, ACC, and the BIG 10 are generating billion dollar contracts for individual goggle box networks while student-athletes are being kept in the dark for their contributions.For instance, the SEC conference will be earning $55 million over 15 years from a CBS deal, and a 15 year deal with ESPN that cashes out to $150 million (Winners and Losers 1). Despite the players being the ones who are generating the audiences, none of these profits from the NCAA or the conferences are being returned back to the students directly. In fact, if we were to try to mathematically calculate the value of how much an athletes room and board fees come out to divided by the amount of time they actually put into being an athlete most are liveness just above, if not below, the pauperization line.For example, a recent study found Duke University basketball players based upon their generated revenue for the school to be worth $1,025,650 . Yet, after calculation (scholarship value / number of hours each puts in) they were found to be living just $732 above the indigence line (Research-NCPA 1). After being worth over one million dollars to their university, they are only rewarded approximately a $200,000 education. Kastel 6 Current college athletes and those from the past are starting to realize this exploitati on more and more especially as profit from television deals and sponsorships become more lucrative.Almost every calendar month the American public is presented with a new story of how a college athlete unfairly received either a monetary reward or a free service because of his athletic talents. We get mad at the young athletes and criticize them for such actions but can we really bear down them? They are superstars generating attention, money, and huge popularity to their institutions and they arent receiving anything different than the kid slapping together the cymbals after every touchdown.College athletes are taking gifts and money because they are becoming certain of the NCAAs exploitation and on top of that most of their scholarships dont even cover their full cost of living. In the perfect world, when ceremonial occasion our favorite college athletes on TV we like to imagine that they came from strong households with parents who stipendiary for their training and had all the opportunities to be successful. We would like to think the tattooed face of a little daughter on our favorite college point guards arm is just his little sister not his daughter who he thinks about trying to send enough money too every week.Fact of the matter is, college athletes across the country have a variety of mess that consume any opportunities for extra money. Things like coming from broken theater families, having children at home, or coming from a low economic neighborhoods cause many student athletes to stress over where their next dollar could come from. Things like clothes, gas, toiletries, amenities, fun activities, extra food for the room, or a repast away from dining hall are all things that Kastel 7 are essential to have money for in college.However, college athletes can only be awarded a scholarship. It bewilders America when we hear of cases of college athletes accepting sums of money under the table in what is becoming an increasingly large black market. H owever, this happens all the time. We only hear about the ones who get caught. Yet, the players arent the ones to blame. According to a study conducted by Drexel University Department of Sport Management, the comely scholarship shortfall, or what the intermediate student athlete had to spend out of his own pocket in 2010-11, was approximately $3,222 (Research-NCPA 2).When the scholarships we have dont cover the student-athletes full cost of living how do we expect them to be able to pay for the necessities of living? If a player has been out of gas for common chord weeks and is out of toiletries can we really blame him from accepting cash in a trill from a booster? College athletes time is consumed by their sports. According to a check out conducted with 21,000 Division I, II, and III athletes, Football players in the NCAAs Division I curl Subdivision (formerly known as Division I-A) said they spent an average of 44. hours a week on their sport playing games, practicing, trai ning and in the training room compared with a little less than 40 hours on donnishs (qtd. in Wieberg 1). This staggering statistic reveals that college athletes are actually spending more of their time on their sport then their actual school work. It is even more staggering when the NCAAs bylaw requires that student athletes only spend 20 hours a week on their sport. With these types of time commitments and dedication to their sports, college athletes dont have time to have a job. This dilemma intensifies the problem of Kastel 8 aving a scholarship shortfall. If there are demand things to pay for and athletes dont have the necessary time to work where is the money supposed to come from? College athletes should receive a stipend of $2,500 a semester to ensure that any necessary cost outside of their scholarship can be covered. By introducing this stipend the number of NCAA infractions relating to athletes taking money will dramatically decrease collectable to the fact that they w ont need to anymore. One might interpret that this would anger regular students who do not receive such benefits.However, according to one statistical survey taken by 458 college students, 58% of them believed that college athletes deserve to receive stipends (College Students Perceptions 1). This study demonstrates that not only would regular students not be upset by college athletes receiving the reward they deserve, but in fact they fleck the need for it. By offering something to college athletes (scholarship) which still requires them to spend such a large sum out of their own pockets we are basically beguiling them to fall into the illegal activities of the black market and potentially jeopardize their academic futures.Stipends must be rewarded and reform is necessary now. The NCAA cannot expect a player with a hungry child at home to refuse money from a booster, just as it cannot place the term amateurism virtually an industry it exploited to be so focused around money. T he NCAA suggests that if we were to provide college student athletes with stipends it would take away the wholeness that college sports still represent by replace their amateur title with that of professionalism. However, college sports which once symbolized the unselfish competitive spirit of America and were Kastel 9 nce run by student led organizations with no mould from school officials or corrupt institutions have already become a capital venture. This is not because of the introduction of a stipend reward organisation, but rather because the money, operation, and industry the NCAA created around college sports has made it too professional in its financial pursuits to be considered amateur. The term amateurism is no nightlong fit to represent college sports but rather a propaganda add by the NCAA to stand them to continue their exploitive efforts.One of the largest indications of the pursuit of this commercial enterprise is the unbelievable amount of money that college co aches are being paid. In 2010, Alabama coach mountain pass Saban committed to a contract that would pay him $4 million dollars a season (Low 1). Most FBS Division 1 institutions athletic departments have a hard time generating any profit at all, but the NCAA allows schools to present astonishing contracts to coaches in order to point their team in the right direction. Yet, the NCAA sees a student athlete receiving a small stipend more of a venture towards professionalism than this?Another indication that college sports can no longer be placed under the amateur title is plain in the evolution of college stadiums. Today the illustration of a new corporate sponsorship is apparent in almost every stadium with things like Ohio State Universitys new $105 million Schottenstein Center, 110 luxury boxes at Neyland roll (University of Tennessee), and the University of Michigan spending $7. 4 million to renovate Michigan field (qtd. in College Students Perceptions 2). The NCAA isnt keeping the industry around college sports simple with basic venues and humble salaries for their coaches.Instead they Kastel 10 create something that is slowing resembling that of professional sports environments. For these exploitations the NCAA can no longer hold college athletics today to a standard of remaining amateurism. The industry surrounding it has far surpassed that point and it is time we reward our college athletes like the professionals we market them to be. Many people argue that even if the NCAA does come to its sentiences and passes a law regulating stipends for Division I institutions, call IX implications would make it almost out(predicate) to implement stipends.Those critics argue that if stipends were approved, deed of conveyance IX would then regulate all student athletes at the school to receive stipends due to equal opportunity. The sum of money required to be able to provide every student athlete with this, critics say, would be impossible for even successful a thletic departments to afford. It is correct that such a reward would be possible for schools to afford. Stipends should only be given to the top three sports that are generating the most revenue. It would create more of an incentive for programs to be successful, and it would reward student athletes of the teams who were having the greatest success.Title IX cannot be applied to the stipend system because it is outdated and needs to be reformed. Title IX was originally created for the racial movement in order to encourage what, at that time, was a change that needed to be enforced (In defense team 1). Today, many schools athletic departments actually lose money by trying to comply with the outdated law. In order to equally match the number of guy to girl scholarships a university might be forced to eliminate a mens revenue generating sport such as hockey and kind of Kastel 11 add a womens sport that loses money ( In Defense 2).Title IX is outdated and if a stipend system is establ ished, the top 3 revenue generating teams should receive a stipend. Whether the NCAA wants to accept it or not, their exploitive actions in pursuit of commercial profit have eliminated any sense of college sports today seeming amateur. Because of this exploitation it is time for college student athletes to ultimately receive the proper reward they have deserved for a steady-going amount of time. College athletes should receive stipends because there is a large discrepancy between what college athletes are worth and how much they are given.This is because athletic scholarships do not cover the full cost of living, and also because the operation, money, and industry associated with college athletics is too great to still be titled amateur. By affording these stipends to college athletes, peradventure just maybe, when that athlete walks into the store and sees that jersey with his name on the back he might be financially secure enough with his living expenses to be able to purchase it. Works Cited 2011-2012 NCAA Division I Manual (August 2011). NCAA Manual. NCAA. org. Web. 09 Nov. 2011. Branch, Taylor. The Shame of College Sports Magazine The Atlantic. The Atlantic News and Analysis on Politics, Business, Culture, Technology, National, International, and animateness TheAtlantic. com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. College Students Perceptions On The Payment Of Intercollegiate Student-Athletes Statistical Data include paginate 2 College Student Journal. Find Articles News Articles, Magazine choke off Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. History of Intercollegiate Athletics and the NCAA. World Scientific Publishing Co. , 12 May 2009.Web. In Defense of Collegiate Athletics The Case Against Paying Student-Athletes Garnet And Black aggress. Garnet And Black Attack For South Carolina Gamecocks Fans. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. Intercollegiate History of the NCAA. NCAA Public Home Page NCAA. org. Web. 09 Nov. 2011. Low, Chris. Nick Saban Commi ts to Alabama Crimson Tide through 2017 Season ESPN. ESPN The ecumenic Leader In Sports. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. OToole, Thomas. NCAA Reaches 14-year Deal with CBS/Turner for Mens Basketball Tournament, Which Expands to 68 Teams for Now. News, Travel, Weather, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, U. S. & World USATODAY. com. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. Research National College Players Association. Home National College Players Association. Web. 18 Nov. 2011. Revenue Vs. Expenses. NCAA Public Home Page NCAA. org. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. Wieberg, Steve. airfield College Athletes Are Full-time Workers USATODAY. com. News, Travel, Weather, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, U. S. & World USATODAY. com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. Winners and Losers In SEC TV Deal. College Gridiron 365. Web. 17 Nov. 2011.