Ontology

The Ontological argument would be that by the use of spring and intuition, if man can call up of or conceive divinity fudge, then God must exist. The Teleological argument would be that at that place is agreed upon read that everything in nature has a purpose or reason for terra firma. This being true, then God has to exist by reason that God created each of this and gave it purpose. The cosmological argument would be that everything is created with for a reason and the God gave everything that reason. I think Cosmological and Teleological arguments are similar in this way of thinking.The philosopher I believe made the strongest impact on me would be Leibniz and the Cosmological argument. Our lives and existence on this planet our so tangled, yet everything seems to fit unitedly and serve a purpose. I know that things happen in the world and we wonder what purpose did that serve, why did that have to happen. In the end, if we really run across at the veritable(a)t object ively and without emotion, we can find the reason. I think of just one thing, the humane body, and I have to marvel in its design. How could someone come up with the idea and design which allows our bodies to function?We are, in essence a perpetual motion machine. Our systems are more complicated then any other piece of machinery out there and even with all of our advancements in computers, non one can compete with the human brain. They are amazing, yet they are hardly as smart as the person who programmed it. Yes, some of them are able to learn but this is only because the programmer has taught them to do so. This is just one aspect of life. You do not have to believe in God per say, but you can not go outside and look around you and not believe that there has to be something out there.