Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Literature Review on Break Up Strategies
Ending every kind of descent is put together to become a traumatic experience to both parties involved. This could include a romantic relationship, friendship and even business partnerships. All relationships involve beard consume(prenominal) interpersonal communication skills that would allow the parties involved to cope and eventually recruit emotionally. on that point are five phases in pause up from a relationship. Duck (as qtd in Dickson, Saunders, and Stringer, 1994 & Interpersonal Communication, para 18-22) place the break up model to have the breakdown phase, intrapsychic phase, dyadic phase, social phase, and grave medical dressing phase.However, any break-up solution would not work successfully unless the three factors in the relationship are identified, namely the high level of satisfaction with the relationship, the defense of both parties of the snip and effort that has g sensation into building it, and the absence of bran-new compensatory attachments. (Dicks on et al, 2004) According to Dr. Margaret Paul, people sample their best to end relationships gracefully such(prenominal) that the society perceives it as a reflection of their worth when someone does not want to be with them any longer (Ending Relationships, para 1).But stop relationships gracefully will al focussings have to go through pain in the ass the other persons feelings. A person may stomach wonderful people though they may not feel any connection to them or a single individual alone. And the only way that person can end that relationship is telling the other the truth. there are on the other hand various strategies in breaking up from a relationship as identified by Baxter (1982, 1984 qtd in Interpersonal Communication, para 12-17) as either unilateral or zygomorphic and indirect or direct.Some of these strategies identified were avoidance, Pseudo de-escalation, cost escalation, fade-way, the blame game, and others. such(prenominal) early work examining initiation, intensification, and termination as relational goals simply compiled ad-hoc lists of strategies for redefining relationships without organizing strategies close to a theoretical framework. More recent work has suggested that theories of politeness or awardwork may be applied to foster rationality of how people encounter and respond to the relational goals of initiation, intensification, and termination of relationships. (Kunkel, Olufowote, Robson, & Wilson, 2003)Politeness theory is one of the most normally utilized strategies implemented by individuals in order to enact their in demand(p) behaviors from their partners. According to the theory, convincing another person to alter his or her own behavior is inherently face threatening, thus they use politeness strategies to try to balance the competing goals f persuading the other an supporting the other persons face. But politeness theory falls short in its competency to explain how compliance seekers must contend with multipl e potential face threats to both their own and the target persons face.(Krunkel et al, 2003) In an term written by Janet Jacobson on countrysingles. com, their study showed that leavers an lefts have varies coping strategies subsequently breaking up from a relationship. Leavers focuses more than on self-enhancement strategies through understanding and improving themselves by spending more of time with friends and families and dates other people. There were however those who become introspective and spends time alone, reflecting on the relationship they had left. (Jacobson, 2004)On one hand, individuals who were left behind focus on self-enhancement. The same with the leavers, lefts spend time with friends and family but they keep themselves more busy with work and/hobbies. They are more likely to change their perspectives on the relationship as much as they try to change their physical appearance to look good. There were excessively those who bad-mouths former partners and thos e who become intentionally mean by flirting with their chivalric partners and eventually dumping them off.Avoidance was as well another strategy identified by the respondents of the study upon coping up with breakups. (Jacobson, 2004) References & Works Cited Dickson, D. , Saunders, C. , & Stringer, M. 1994. Rewarding people The Skill of Responding Positively. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution. Retrieved from http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Interpersonal_communication_relationship_dissolutionPhases_of_dissolution on declination 7, 2007. Jacobson, J. 2004.COPING with a BREAK-UP a report on strategies. Retrieved from http//www. countrysingles. com/azsinglescenecom/ biography/coping_with_6-04. htm on December 7, 2007. Kunkel, A. , Olufowote, J. , Robson, S. , & Wilson, S. 2003. Identity implications of influence goals initiating, intensifying, and ending romantic relationships. westbound Journal of Communication Paul, M. Ending Relationships Gracefully. Retrieved from http//www. innerbonding. com/show- article/657/ending-relationships-gracefully. html on December 7, 2007.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment