Construction Of The Great Pyramid Essay -- essays research papers

Of the three theories on how the Great gain was built, in descending order of acceptability, the most suited surmise is Clifford Wilsons followed by Joseph Davidovits and Erich Von Dnikens argument. Clifford Wilsons theory is the best because he illustrates how the pyramids were built and provides the narrate to prove his theory, however this is unlike Joseph Davidovits theory because Davidovits does non fully answer questions that find concerning his theory. The three theories have similar points, and contain very different ideas on the construction of the Great Pyramid. This is translucent in Clifford Wilsons argument where he is repeatedly disproving Von Dnikens theory that the gods created the pyramids, whereas in Davidovits theory the pyramids were simply casted by means of chemically mixing Natron, aluminum and silicon to produce artificial rock. These three individuals verbalise different ideas on the building of the building of the Great Pyramid.Clifford Wilson has the most delightful theory comp ard to the other two individuals arguments. In Clifford Wilsons theory, he suggests that the pyramids were built with the heave-ho method. With the use of sleds made from wood that is easily import from Phoenicia and rope, it is an acceptable theory on how the Great Pyramid was built. Wilson has also seen workers, use a single rope and pulley, move stones as the supervisor chants go forth instructions. One question that arises is how the builders were able to lift the stones into place. Wilson explains that during the construction of the pyramid, a rage made of earth could be increased as the height of the pyramid increased. Once outer limestone blocks are fitted into place the earth could simply be removed. Clifford Wilson clearly verifies his theory with specific details, which displays that his theory is the most logical and suitable explanation of the construction of the Great Pyramid.Although Clifford Wilsons theory is the best, there are sti ll a few weaknesses throughout his argument. Wilson suggests that by using a system of pulleys, open ups and ropes its is possible to construct the pyramid. With recent studies, it has been shown that if using a lever system as Wilson suggests, the fulcrums height must be increased, and at certain heights, the whole lever can become unstable. Another occupation that is brought up is with the use of... ...nce. Von Dnikens theory is clearly the clear up when compared to the other two arguments, and this is particularly due to incorrect data.Even though Von Dnikens theory is the poorest in quality, he still brings up important ideas that need to be examined. For example, the Egyptians knew the distance between the sun and the earth, and the geographic locations of other continents. This information could have been thought up, but it is more practical to consider that Egyptians did have contact with extra-terrestrials. Despite Von Dnikens deleterious theory , he still brings up key issues, but chiefly his theory is of no use because of the lack of significant data. Of the three theories, Clifford Wilsons theory remains the most acceptable because he illustrates how the pyramids were built and provides the evidence to prove his argument. Joseph Davidovits on the other hand, does not fully answer questions that arise concerning his theory. Von Dnikens theory contains incorrect and irrelevant data that makes his theory the worst when compared to the other two arguments. In conclusion, Clifford Wilson had umteen effective points that disproved many Davidovits and Von Dnikens points.