Was Socrates guilty or not?

Plato wrote about trail of Socrates in ancient Athens. Writer caput story in a way where we dont get to overtake upon accusers, we are only able to hear an explanation of a person who was called to the court. In the end of the story Socrates is found finable to be punished but does that judgment reflect veritable guiltiness? When we considering whether someones is guilty or innocent, first we have to catch walking(prenominal) at the system of justice, rules that it follows and charges carried out. Every court follow original rules and has its own unique point of view. One can come out a judgment of guiltiness and other opposite in the same case. Court which judged Socrates follows by the rules that were set up by Athenians and reflect the standards and norms of Athens at that time. So even though we didnt get to hear accusers, reader can conclude that their bring through applied better to well known standards, required in court in opposite to the speech of Socrates whi ch didnt o deepen judges. Accused claims Ive been convinced because I was at loss, not gloss over for speeches, but for daring and shamelessness and willingness to say the sorts of things to you that you would have been close to pleased to hear :me wailing and lamenting .. (38d).

This means Socrates was conscious, that hes judged by rules that might not uncover the truth behind charges, and bordering and agreeing to those rules is impossible for him because he would deny to a person he was all his life. So what is Socrates accused of? He challenges with charges that have been come up umteen years before the trial and sound handle that: Socrates does disadvant! age and is meddlesome, by investigating the things under the earth and the celestial things, If you demand to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper