.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Battle of Sand Creek

On November 29, 1864, a cavalry viciously fireed a camp of Indians. These Arapaho and jacket of Wyoming Indians were nearly harmless considering most(prenominal) of the people killed were wo custody and children. They did non deserve to be brutalized and tone-beginninged with come to the fore warning. The knight attacked and mevery people ran as they were in their homes when the event started. Most manpower stayed and fought with arrows, and a few with guns, so they did non do such(prenominal) damage considering the enemy was development all guns. The soldiers that attacked were under the operate of Col whizl John Chivington (Perrigo). They could hardly be considered human after they killed m each women and children on with the men. After a game of ground of fighting, they stop and retreated. The soldiers had killed astir(predicate) one blow and fifty Indians. Women and children accounted for ab away seventy five per centum of that toll (Bent). There should not have been any dyings because when the soldiers were forward-moving towards the village, the chief, blackamoor Kettle, had raised a flag to show that they were favorable and takeed no confrontations (Bent). The soldiers unattended this sign and started to fire on them. As many of the Indians ran on the creek, they found bodies of their companions who the soldiers had already killed (Bent). While Chivingtons men retreated, they halt to scalp and sack any Indian corpses that had not been touched yet (Powell). The good morning after the battle, the hatred act when the soldiers found a honey oil boy who had been buried by bodies, but was still alive. They took him out of the pile and blew his head forth (Powell). It is obvious that the cavalry had the output when you look at the death tolls.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The Indians addled between quartet hundred and five hundred men, while the soldiers only mazed nine (Perrigo). They even killed a few Indian chiefs, including depressed Kettle. It is obvious that there was real no reason to attack the Indians at anchor brook so harshly. They should have stopped when the flag was raised viewing that the Indians did not have any problems with them. They just wanted to be left alone. WORKS CITED: Bent, George. Forty geezerhood with the Cheyennes. 1905. Perrigo, Lynn I. E. Major Hal Sayrs Diary of the Sand Creek Campaign. 1938. Powell, Father come across John. People of the Sacred Mountain. 1917. If you want to get a commensurate essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment